|
Home
|
E-Submission
|
Sitemap
|
Contact Us
|
HOME
ABOUT
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Subscriptions
Contact us
BROWSE ARTICLES
All issues
Current Issue
Most Read Articles
Most Cited Articles
CSD Search
Author Index
CURRENT ISSUE
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS
Publish with CSD
E-Submission
Guidelines for Research Ethics
Open Access
Instructions for Authors
Checklist
Instructions for Peer Reviewers
Commun Sci Disord
Search
The Relationship between Working Memory and
Metaphor
Comprehension in Patients with Right Hemisphere Damage
Hyo Dong Shin, Soyoung Choi
Commun Sci Disord.
2017;22(4):745-755. Published online December 31, 2017 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17429
Web of Science 2
Crossref 2
Context-Dependent
Metaphor
Comprehension Ability of School-Aged Children with Borderline Intellectual Functioning
Yun Ji Kwak, Mina Hwang, Miran Jeong
Commun Sci Disord.
2016;21(3):451-461. Published online September 30, 2016 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.16333
Crossref 1
The Correlation between
Metaphor
Comprehension and Reading Comprehension of Poor Readers in 4-6 Grades
Hyun-Jung Lee, Mibae Kim
Commun Sci Disord.
2015;20(2):331-343. Published online June 30, 2015 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.15238
Web of Science 5
Crossref 5
The Relationship between Working Memory and
Metaphor
Comprehension in School-Age Children with Specific Language Impairments
Youngju Hong, Dongsun Yim
Commun Sci Disord.
2014;19(2):191-198. Published online June 30, 2014 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.14115
Web of Science 3
Crossref 4
The Comprehension of Figurative Meaning in ADHD Children with and without Language Impairment
Jongah Lim
Commun Sci Disord.
2010;15(3):307-320.
Metaphor
Comprehension in Adults with Right-hemisphere Brain Damage: Some Effects of Task Presentation Conditions
Sung-Hee Lee, Jongah Lim, Mina Hwang
Commun Sci Disord.
2009;14(4):484-494.
Metaphor
Comprehension with a Damaged Right Hemisphere: Focusing on Word Association and Verbal Analogical Processes
Eun-Jung Kim, Yaelin Choi
Commun Sci Disord.
2009;14(1):70-81.
1
|
Journal Impact Factor 0.5